|
World Database of NematodesLinked to the Marine Biology Section, UGent |
| Start | Browse taxonomy |
Search taxonomy |
Search literature |
Search distributions |
Identification keys |
Media gallery | Editors | Statistics | Citations | Match taxa | Contact | Login |
Nemys taxon detailsEnoplida
2141 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:2141)
Filipjev, 1929
accepted
Order
Rhaptothyreida · unaccepted (The order contained only one...)
The order contained only one family Rhaptothyreidae which was transferred to the order Enoplida by Leduc et al. 2018 Trefusiida · unaccepted (junior synonym)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Taxonomic remark Note on the authorship of Enoplida
The authorship of the order Enoplida has been a source of confusion in the...
Taxonomic remark Note on the authorship of Enoplida The authorship of the order Enoplida has been a source of confusion in the nematological literature. Although the name Enoplida is often associated with Chitwood's classification and has occasionally been cited as Enoplida Baird, 1853, the origin of the taxon traces back to the classification proposed by Filipjev (1929). In his seminal work The classification of freeliving Nematoda and relations to parasitic forms (1929), Filipjev established the group Enoplata, using the suffix -ata then employed for nematode orders. The concept, circumscription, and diagnosis of the group were therefore introduced by Filipjev. Subsequently, Chitwood (1937 - p.78) revised nematode classification and adopted the standardized zoological ordinal suffix -ida, resulting in the name Enoplida. Although Chitwood used the corrected spelling at ordinal rank, the taxonomic concept remained that originally established by Filipjev. Under the principles of zoological nomenclature, a change in suffix required to conform with later rank-ending conventions does not transfer authorship of the taxon. Chitwood (1937) explicitly recognized both Order Enoplida Chitwood, 1933 and Suborder Enoplata Filipjev, 1929 within his classification. Later, Chitwood (1960) cited Baird, 1853 in connection with the superfamily Enoploidea, a reference that appears to have contributed to the subsequent but erroneous attribution of the order to Baird. For this reason, modern authorities and databases attribute the order to its original author and concept, citing the taxon as Enoplida Filipjev, 1929, with Enoplata Filipjev, 1929 representing the original form of the name prior to adoption of the standardized ordinal suffix -ida. [details]
Nemys eds. (2025). Nemys: World Database of Nematodes. Enoplida. Accessed at: https://nemys.ugent.be/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=2141 on 2026-07-21
original description
Filipjev, I. N. (1929). The classification of freeliving Nematoda and relations to parasitic forms. <em>J. Parasit.</em> 15: 281-282. [details] Available for editors
 [request]original description (of Trefusiida) Lorenzen, S. (1981). Entwurf eines phylogenetischen Systems der freilebenden Nematoden. <em>Veroffentlichungen des Instituts fur Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven.</em> 7: 1-472. page(s): 270 [details] Available for editors [request]taxonomy source De Ley, P.; Blaxter, M. L. (2004). A new system for Nematoda: combining morphological characters with molecular trees, and translating clades into ranks and taxa. <em>Nematology Monographs & Perspectives - Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Nematology 8 - 13 June 2002, Tenerife, Spain.</em> 2: 633-653., available online at https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004475236_061 [details] Available for editors [request]taxonomy source Zhang, Z. N. (2005). Three new species of free‐living marine nematodes from the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea, China. <em>Journal of Natural History.</em> 39(23): 2109-2123., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930500082029 [details] Available for editors [request]taxonomy source Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (Ed.). (2014). Handbook of Zoology. Gastrotricha, Cycloneuralia and Gnathifera: 2. Nematoda. <em>Handbook of Zoology (2010) Walter De Gruyter: Berlin.</em> 759 pp., available online at http://www.degruyter.com/view/product/180464 [details] Available for editors [request]basis of record Nemaslan: Biodiversity of Antarctic Nematodes (2004). (look up in IMIS) [details] ecology source Raes, M.; De Troch, M.; Ndaro, S. G. M.; Muthumbi, A.; Guilini, K.; Vanreusel, A. (2007). The structuring role of microhabitat type in coral degradation zones: a case study with marine nematodes from Kenya and Zanzibar. <em>Coral Reefs.</em> 26 (1): 13-126., available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-006-0184-8 [details] Available for editors [request]identification resource Zullini, A. (2021). NEMATODI D'ACQUA DOLCE - Manuale di identificazione al genere e metodi di raccolta. <em>Biologia Ambientale - Rivista del Centro Italiano Studi di Biologia Ambientale.</em> volume 35 2021 - 2° supplemento - ISSN 2611-5182. [details] Available for editors [request] Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark Note on the authorship of EnoplidaThe authorship of the order Enoplida has been a source of confusion in the nematological literature. Although the name Enoplida is often associated with Chitwood's classification and has occasionally been cited as Enoplida Baird, 1853, the origin of the taxon traces back to the classification proposed by Filipjev (1929). In his seminal work The classification of freeliving Nematoda and relations to parasitic forms (1929), Filipjev established the group Enoplata, using the suffix -ata then employed for nematode orders. The concept, circumscription, and diagnosis of the group were therefore introduced by Filipjev. Subsequently, Chitwood (1937 - p.78) revised nematode classification and adopted the standardized zoological ordinal suffix -ida, resulting in the name Enoplida. Although Chitwood used the corrected spelling at ordinal rank, the taxonomic concept remained that originally established by Filipjev. Under the principles of zoological nomenclature, a change in suffix required to conform with later rank-ending conventions does not transfer authorship of the taxon. Chitwood (1937) explicitly recognized both Order Enoplida Chitwood, 1933 and Suborder Enoplata Filipjev, 1929 within his classification. Later, Chitwood (1960) cited Baird, 1853 in connection with the superfamily Enoploidea, a reference that appears to have contributed to the subsequent but erroneous attribution of the order to Baird. For this reason, modern authorities and databases attribute the order to its original author and concept, citing the taxon as Enoplida Filipjev, 1929, with Enoplata Filipjev, 1929 representing the original form of the name prior to adoption of the standardized ordinal suffix -ida. [details] |
Page generated 2026-08-10 · contact: Tânia Nara Bezerra or info@marinespecies.org