|
World Database of NematodesLinked to the Marine Biology Section, UGent |
| Start | Browse taxonomy |
Search taxonomy |
Search literature |
Search distributions |
Identification keys |
Media gallery | Editors | Statistics | Citations | Match taxa | Contact | Login |
Nemys name detailsNeotonchidae Wieser & Hopper, 1966
2165 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:2165)
unaccepted (Bezerra, et. al. 2013 - New genus and two new species of the family Ethmolaimidae (Nematoda: Chromadorida), found in two different cold-seep environments)
Family
Genus Neotonchoides Platt, 1982
» Species Neotonchoides cuanensis Platt, 1982
» Species Neotonchoides pseudocorcundus Vitiello, 1971 » Species Neotonchoides vitius Warwick, 1971 » Species Neotonchoides cuanensis Platt, 1982 accepted as Comesa cuanensis (Platt, 1982) ((Preoccupied)) » Species Neotonchoides warwicki Platt, 1982 accepted as Comesa warwicki (Platt, 1982)
marine
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Although the publication Handbook of Zoology. Gastrotricha, Cycloneuralia and Gnathifera: 2. Nematoda - Schmidt-Rhaesa, A....
Taxonomic remark Although the publication Handbook of Zoology. Gastrotricha, Cycloneuralia and Gnathifera: 2. Nematoda - Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (Ed.) 2014 was published later, the chapters of the book were finished in some cases one year - or longer - before. This explains the absence of the genus Dystomanema, Bezerra et.at. 2013. In that publication there are also remarks on the classification of the family Ethmolaimidae and its members, stating: "Currently, the status of the family Ethmolaimidae and its two subfamilies, the Ethmolaiminae and Neotonchinae, is generally accepted. De Ley & Blaxter (2002) had raised the Neotonchinae to family level, reestablishing the family Neotonchidae, but we fail to see the reasons why and there are no solid arguments provided by De Ley & Blaxter (2002) to deviate from the classification at subfamily level and above as given in Platt (1982); presumably Platt’s work and/or Lorenzen’s (1994) very brief acknowledgement of Platt’s work (1982) were overlooked. The Ethmolaimidae Filipjev & Stekhoven, 1941 therefore consists of two subfamilies, (1) the Ethmolaiminae Filipjev & Stekhoven, 1941, containing the genera Ethmolaimus de Man, 1880 and Paraethmolaimus Jensen, 1994, and (2) the Neotonchinae Wieser & Hopper, 1966, containing the genera Comesa Gerlach, 1956, Dystomanema, Filitonchoides Jensen, 1985, Filitonchus Platt, 1982, Gomphionchus Platt, 1982, Gomphionema Wieser & Hopper, 1966, Nannolaimus Cobb, 1920, and Neothonchus Cobb, 1933." [details]
Nemys eds. (2023). Nemys: World Database of Nematodes. Neotonchidae Wieser & Hopper, 1966. Accessed at: https://www.nemys.ugent.be/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=2165 on 2023-06-05
Date action by 2004-12-21 15:54:05Z created db_admin
taxonomy source
De Ley, P.; Blaxter, M. L. (2004). A new system for Nematoda: combining morphological characters with molecular trees, and translating clades into ranks and taxa. <em>Nematology Monographs & Perspectives - Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Nematology 8 - 13 June 2002, Tenerife, Spain.</em> 2: 633-653. [details] Available for editors
 [request] taxonomy source Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (Ed.). (2014). Handbook of Zoology. Gastrotricha, Cycloneuralia and Gnathifera: 2. Nematoda. <em>Handbook of Zoology (2010) Walter De Gruyter: Berlin.</em> 759 pp., available online at http://www.degruyter.com/view/product/180464 [details] Available for editors [request] basis of record Nemaslan: Biodiversity of Antarctic Nematodes (2004). (look up in IMIS) [details] additional source Various Authors (2000). Nematode filing cabinet of the Marine Biology Section Ugent - in combination with the NemasLan Ms-Access database (published on CD-Rom, 2000) (look up in IMIS) [details]  Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark Although the publication Handbook of Zoology. Gastrotricha, Cycloneuralia and Gnathifera: 2. Nematoda - Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (Ed.) 2014 was published later, the chapters of the book were finished in some cases one year - or longer - before. This explains the absence of the genus Dystomanema, Bezerra et.at. 2013. In that publication there are also remarks on the classification of the family Ethmolaimidae and its members, stating: "Currently, the status of the family Ethmolaimidae and its two subfamilies, the Ethmolaiminae and Neotonchinae, is generally accepted. De Ley & Blaxter (2002) had raised the Neotonchinae to family level, reestablishing the family Neotonchidae, but we fail to see the reasons why and there are no solid arguments provided by De Ley & Blaxter (2002) to deviate from the classification at subfamily level and above as given in Platt (1982); presumably Platt’s work and/or Lorenzen’s (1994) very brief acknowledgement of Platt’s work (1982) were overlooked. The Ethmolaimidae Filipjev & Stekhoven, 1941 therefore consists of two subfamilies, (1) the Ethmolaiminae Filipjev & Stekhoven, 1941, containing the genera Ethmolaimus de Man, 1880 and Paraethmolaimus Jensen, 1994, and (2) the Neotonchinae Wieser & Hopper, 1966, containing the genera Comesa Gerlach, 1956, Dystomanema, Filitonchoides Jensen, 1985, Filitonchus Platt, 1982, Gomphionchus Platt, 1982, Gomphionema Wieser & Hopper, 1966, Nannolaimus Cobb, 1920, and Neothonchus Cobb, 1933." [details] |
Page generated 2023-06-05 · contact: Tânia Nara Bezerra or info@marinespecies.org